Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
黄政民被导演绑架拍的这部片子。比原版稍好的地方是加进来的几个女性角色，但原版偏现实主义的犯罪风格全被韩国典型商业片花里胡哨那一套给取代了，太吵了，即使不考虑原版，也是不及格的商业片。
最后的心里描写挺真实。但过程中的主角光环太重了。光脚，腿上被扎，背后被撞等都可以打得过带手铐的犯人。太无敌了就难免代入
看完吧都不好意思多提，推荐的话是一句说不出口，我甚至觉得这么比起来，从邪恶中拯救我好像也不是不能上四，总之是很糟糕的。想说适可而止吧韩国人，别再消耗黄政民了，没有他这片儿就是一星。
丁青那个狠劲儿真的是演出来的。咋不给李政宰打电话呢
韩国警察一如既往被黑成弱智，电梯战神靠自己救出自己，还是韩国那个味儿…
吴若甫看完了都说好，6.1分？打低分的人都是狗吗？
黄政民的演技没得说，改编的偏商业，解救吾先生更偏现实一点。
打斗戏手铐的桥段和老手如出一辙…
不如王千源原版。人物扁平化，为恶而恶。黄政民一个人撑起了整部戏。女绑匪是C罩杯，我喜欢。韩国警察菜的离谱，称的上无能。本片应起名叫:黄政民救黄政民。
太疯了，跟翻拍的那部毒战一样，反派都是神经病一样的疯狂
〖本片根据真实影片凯遍〗
比《解救吾先生》打斗的场面多，也大胆的多，虽然提取了主线，但是内容还是做了不少改动，又是逃跑又是炸警察。反一无论神情还是样貌真的是跟王立华十分相似。最后居然还有一场王立华肉搏吴若甫，结局居然设定成了吴若甫才是自救的最大赢家。生生把警匪题材扭转成了黄政民智勇双全的人生大冒险，就是黄政民太不像真实的黄政民了，也不像吴若浦，也不像刘德华，像兰博。
最后的心里描写挺真实。但过程中的主角光环太重了。光脚，腿上被扎，背后被撞等都可以打得过带手铐的犯人。太无敌了就难免代入
黄政民是以真名出演电影最多的演员吧（《舞后》也是）。
跟原版比，少了绑匪头目回到城里找爱人的情节，多了男主和被绑架的女子的互动…整体看来，跟韩国同类型的优秀影片比，不算出色。
又是炸酱面，他们咋这么喜欢吃
黄政民依然演技炸裂，这不能看作是解救吾先生的翻拍，故事虽然一样，但拍摄手法和角色的着重点都完全不一样，算是一部新的韩国电影，跟以前的韩国电影比，这部的配角稍微差了点，整部戏就靠黄政民在撑了，但是我觉得角色名字不应该叫黄政民，黄政民本人有这么厉害吗？
韩国版《解救吾先生》，黄政民原名出演，剧情情节做了部分修改！棒子国的警察办案与实战能力真是有待提高，女绑匪C罩杯，神经质的老大爷，人质自救暴力抵抗绑匪，勇敢无畏！“吴若甫事件”中主犯带的自制手雷，终于在棒子国街头炸响！哦西把！
可惜他们应该展开后面的故事也许会好一些，但是没有也许
跟原版比，少了绑匪头目回到城里找爱人的情节，多了男主和被绑架的女子的互动…整体看来，跟韩国同类型的优秀影片比，不算出色。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
